How should we pay for the NHS?
نویسنده
چکیده
The question of how much we should spend on the NHS, and by what means, seems to have reached new urgency. Over the past week the BBC’s NHS Health Check series of special reports has given graphic form to a rising tide of concern, as waiting lists lengthen, increasingly sick and elderly patients queue inside and outside emergency departments, and overburdened doctors and nurses speak openly about their fears for patients’ safety. Patients and relatives are asked what’s to be done. Their simple reply: “We need more beds, more staff.” In the heat of this current crisis, might we imagine a different world, in which most NHS care has been shifted to the community, and the need for hospital beds is falling? Sue Brown, winner of the King’s Fund “the NHS if” essay competition, does just that (doi:10.1136/bmj.j602). A new government persuades a sceptical public that it must temporarily increase taxes to invest in the alternative to hospital care: health and wellbeing and, initially, an oversupply of home care. Once community services are established, money is withdrawn from hospitals, despite doctors’ strikes. Finally, means testing for social care is stopped for all but the very rich, at last allowing full integration with healthcare. Only two things are missing to realise this beautiful vision, says Brown: money and political will. Would a dedicated NHS tax be the answer? As part of a series entitled “If I ruled the NHS” that The BMJ ran during the last general election campaign, Henry Marsh saw a hypothecated tax as one way to depoliticise the NHS and rescue it from the vagaries of electioneering (doi:10.1136/bmj.h1483). In our Head to Head article this week Richard Layard extends the argument (doi:10.1136/bmj.j471). A dedicated tax would make it easier to translate public demand for a better health service into action, he says, and would avoid the uncertainty of alternating periods of famine and plenty. But John Appleby thinks this would give only the illusion of certainty. He says that we will still need a conversation between politicians and the public about what we want to spend on healthcare and the trade-offs with other things. This and other important conversations now have a new home within The BMJ. Our revamped blog site, BMJ Opinion (blogs. bmj.com/bmj), is a place to find superb writing on health and healthcare from the UK and around the world. Take a look and do send us your comments and contributions.
منابع مشابه
Wolves and Big Yellow Taxis: How Would Be Know If the NHS Is at Death’s Door? Comment on “Who killed the English National Health Service?”
Martin Powell suggests that the death of the English National Health Service (NHS) has been announced so many times we are at risk of not noticing should it actually happen. He is right. If we ‘cry wolf’ too many times, we risk losing sight of what is important about the NHS and why.
متن کاملSpecial Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
Background Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interven...
متن کاملNHS Values, Compassion and Quality Indicators for Relationship Based Person-Centred Healthcare; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”
The paper by Gilbert et al. should be on the table of every politician and National Health Service (NHS) manager in the run up to the general election, when the NHS is at the hustings. They have raised profound moral dilemmas of the internal and external market in their present form, such as the practicalities of distributive justice and the enhancement of autonomy – to which are added the pres...
متن کاملEmployee Engagement within the NHS: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background Employee engagement is the emotional commitment of the employee towards the organisation. We aimed to analyse baseline work engagement using Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) at a teaching hospital. Methods We have conducted a cross-sectional study within the National Health Service (NHS) Teaching Hospital in the UK. All participants were working age population from both genders...
متن کاملLabour pledges to raise NHS wages in line with inflation.
Labour’s shadow health secretary, Andy Burnham, has committed to make no real terms cuts in NHS pay under a future Labour government—a pledge that the health secretary for England, JeremyHunt, and the Liberal Democrat health minister Norman Lamb refused to match. The politicians were put on the spot by the BMA’s chair of council, Mark Porter, at a debate on health and social care in London this...
متن کاملWhy and How Is Compassion Necessary to Provide Good Quality Healthcare?
Recent disclosures of failures of care in the National Health Service (NHS) in England have led to debates about compassion deficits disallowing health professionals to provide high quality responsive care. While the link between high quality care and compassion is often taken for granted, it is less obvious how compassion – often originating in the individual’s emotional response – can become ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 356 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017